symbolism Archives – Benjamin T. Milnes

A Flag of the English – The White Dragon Flag

I have always been tremendously jealous of the Welsh flag. It’s got a dragon on it – it looks fantastic.

The English flag, by comparison, is rather plain – a red cross on white. Plainness is generally quite a good thing in flag design – it means the flag is easily recognisable and easily reproducible. But still – who doesn’t want a dragon? Dragon flags look fantastic. The flag of Bhutan has a dragon on it, and it looks amazing. The flag of the Qing dynasty also had a dragon on it, and that looks even better – a truly outstanding flag design – much better than the current Chinese flag – they should consider going back to it.

Why can’t we have a dragon on our flag? Well the thing is … we could. The symbolism of the red dragon on the Welsh flag goes back to Arthurian legend. A red dragon and a white dragon are locked in combat, with the red dragon representing the native Britons (the Celts) – now the Welsh – and the white dragon representing the Anglo-Saxons – now the English. So a white dragon is a symbol of the English.

This is fairly well known – lots of people already know this, and lots of people have already had the idea of making a white dragon flag to represent the English. (I mean, you could argue the idea never went away from Anglo-Saxon times – the Kingdom of Wessex used a golden dragon as its symbol (still on the flag of Wessex today, though as a wyvern (the distinction being somewhat unimportant here)), and the flag of Somerset also features a dragon.) But the idea has not spread very far – partly I think just because of a lack of awareness of the symbol, but also because of a lack of good designs. A good design propagates on its own.

So for a while now I’ve thought it would be good to make some designs for an English White Dragon flag – an unofficial flag as an alternative to the St. George’s Cross.

The simplest thing to do is just to change the colours on the Welsh flag, as shown below. (I am most certainly not the first person to do this – you can see that others have already done it just with a quick internet search.)

This is the exact same design as the Welsh flag – it just uses the red of the dragon from the Welsh flag as the background, and then the dragon itself is pure white. The design is incredibly striking – I think actually even more so than the Welsh flag.

This design also looks fantastic with a black background.

As with my design for a flag of Wiltshire (featuring a white horse), I find myself torn between different styles of illustration. The dragon on the Welsh flag is obviously very stylised – it’s not just a dragon, it’s a heraldic dragon. I particularly like heraldry and I quite like the heraldic style of illustration, but I do think there are some things that are a bit odd about the design here.

I have never liked what I call the ‘demon’s tail’ style of tail that the design above has. Almost every cartoon drawing of a demon has a tail like that. Personally I think it would look better if it were more naturalistic. That goes for the dragon’s tongue too.

I have also never liked the ‘nose horn’ of the dragon. This seems like a rather odd place to have a horn (that is, a forward-pointing one). In more naturalistic depictions of dragons – which are rather common nowadays thanks to CGI – you never see this. (It’s a remarkable thing that, with decades of stories and movies about dragons, we now have a very strong collective understanding of what a dragon is supposed to look like.)

So I set about modifying the above design. The result is below.

As with my design for a white horse flag for Wiltshire, I found that there were so many things to agonise over while making this design.

I wanted to make some improvements to the design, but I also wanted to retain much of the style – the heraldic style – of the original design. Of course, here we’re not dealing with a purely mathematical design – we’re dealing with freeform paths that can be given any shape. Should this control point go here? Should I move it slightly? Is that a better curve? That looks good, but does it deviate from the style too much? I agonised for hours and hours over it. I am not really certain about most of it, but at some point you just have to decide that it’s done.

I have removed the ‘demon’s tail’. I have also changed the tongue. Now, I’ve given it a forked tongue – that’s sort of a bit of a problem because of course a forked tongue typically carries the symbolism of the snake and of deception. That’s not the intended meaning here, of course – the aim is just to be naturalistic.

I have removed the nose horn, and elongated the dragon’s face. I think this is a tremendous improvement – again, more naturalistic – but of course it does lose some of that heraldic style. I have changed the eye quite substantially – making it a bit meaner. The eye on the original design makes the dragon look a bit dopey. I have also adjusted its spines – and I think this is the only change that I’m completely sure of.

There are so many other things I could have changed (adding more spines along the tail, changing the wings to be a bit more anatomical, changing the ears to look a bit more reptilian, and so on), but of course that risks losing some of the style. As with my white horse flag for Wiltshire, I consider this to just be Version 1 – I may make other versions in future with more modifications. I would also like to make some versions that don’t use the heraldic design at all – and which use something a bit more ‘modern’, for lack of a better word.

So we English can have a dragon on our flag, and it looks rather good. As ever, I don’t suggest making this the official flag – it’s just nice to have as an unofficial one. I’ll be getting some of these made for myself.

A Flag of Wiltshire – A White Horse on a Green Field

I was born in Wiltshire, and I have lived in the county for the majority of my life. I have a very long ancestry here – I can trace my ancestry back over 400 years in just one town. (And it certainly goes back further than that – 400 years is just what I’ve been able to trace.) Various branches of the family tree spread out across the county.

There is, if you didn’t know, an official flag of Wiltshire. All (or at least most – I haven’t checked) of the English counties have flags. The Wiltshire one was designed in the 2000s by Mike Prior. I’m not overly enthusiastic about the design: curved green and white stripes, with a green circle in the middle and a golden great bustard (a bird native to Wiltshire) on top. (I like the great bustard, but I just don’t quite like the shapes in the rest of it.)

I’ve known for a while that there has been an alternate flag design – an unofficial one. It features a white horse on a field of green. It is a reference to the many white horse figures that can be seen on hillsides throughout the county – Wiltshire has the most white horses of any county. This seems like a much more fitting symbol of the county than stripes and the great bustard. (Of course, Wiltshire doesn’t have the Uffington White Horse figure – the original, prehistoric white horse figure, which is about 2000-3000 years old. That’s in Oxfordshire, in the Vale of the White Horse. But that hill figure is less than 10 miles away from the border of Wiltshire – the Vale of the White Horse itself bordering Wiltshire, of course.)

This unofficial white horse flag was apparently also designed in the 2000s, by Chris Fear. While I like the idea of a flag of Wiltshire featuring a white horse, I’m not too enthusiastic about this specific design either. It’s based on the Cherhill White Horse – which is a white horse hill figure that’s located in the county. But that hill figure looks a little peculiar – in fact it almost looks more like a deer than a horse. Symbolism is extremely important (in flags, but also in anything artistic), but I think a bit of creative licence is also valuable in order to make a design that’s really distinctive (and, with luck, iconic).

So recently I’ve been thinking: why not make a new design? A new design of a white horse on a green field, but one which is a bit more … horsey – and, dare I say, dramatic … expressive …

It’s taken me a while to get round to doing it, but now I’ve done it, and the design is below.

A Flag of Wiltshire – The White Horse Flag – Version 1

I found this very difficult to do. There were many choices to be made when making the design. What pose should the horse be in? How stylised should the design be? How detailed should it be? What colour green should I use?

I decided to have the horse running. Most of the hill figures show the horse standing, but I think that’s not quite dramatic or exciting enough for a flag. A horse running looks quite majestic.

Flag design – particularly flag design for English counties – is connected to, or even part of, heraldry. Heraldry has its own conventions and style. When drawing animals in heraldry (well, when drawing anything, really), there’s a certain style to how its drawn. It might have been nice to do that here, but I’m not sufficiently well versed in that style to be able to do it. In fact, I’m not sufficiently well versed in any style to be able to make a stylised illustration. So the design is very literal, and flat. There’s a danger that that can make something look a bit corporate (and looking corporate must be avoided at all costs), but I think the result is a simplicity that is easy to recognise, and easy to replicate. I have heard that a good flag design should be something that a child could draw from memory by hand.

Lots of flags nowadays – particularly country flags – have mathematical specifications for how they should look. It’s easy to see why countries do this – if the design is specified mathematically, there can be no arguments about whether any one copy of the flag is correct. Doing this is much easier with geometric designs, of course – it’s quite easy to do this with the Flag of England, the Flag of Scotland, the Union Jack, and countless others. But this kind of mathematical specification is somewhat at odds with traditional heraldry. In traditional heraldry, figures and shapes are defined descriptively, not mathematically, and colours are certainly not defined in a universal way. The design is allowed to vary. With the design above, any number of small changes could be made to the outline of the horse without it looking substantially different, so this kind of flag naturally resists mathematical definition. In some ways that’s a good thing – it puts the flag a bit more in line with traditional heraldry – but in some ways its a bad thing – it is hard (or impossible) to replicate the design exactly unless you have the original.

The horse figure on the flag is, of course, pure white. Choosing a green was difficult. When you really get into it, green is actually quite a difficult colour. There are so many different hues and shades of green, and they all carry with them their own connections, meanings, and moods. The exact green that I’ve chosen here has a hue of 150, a saturation of 35, and a lightness of 25. That makes it a bluish green (which I generally prefer myself, but which I think also has a very classic look to it). To me it is reminiscent of wet grass or foliage in autumn or winter. It is a deep, retreating green suitable for one of the most rural counties in the country.

While I like this design, I am not entirely convinced that it is what I intended when I set out on this project. Perhaps I would prefer something different? Perhaps there are slight refinements that I could have made, but which I overlooked? I can spend forever and a day contemplating designs like this and still not come to any conclusions about them. So rather than have this thing sit on my computer for years while I ponder it, I’m just going to label this one ‘Version 1’, and if I decide that actually I want to do something differently, I’ll come back later and do a version 2, version 3, and so on.

I do not intend for this flag to necessarily replace the existing official flag. I simply wanted to have the design, and allow other people to have it as well. How can we know what flag design we really want unless we have some options to choose between? I’m a huge fan of having unofficial versions of things that exist alongside the official versions – unofficial national anthems (like Rule, Britannia! and Land of Hope and Glory), unofficial national symbols – and in this case unofficial flags. We don’t just have to have one thing, the official thing.

So this is Version 1. I may come back later and make some different versions, but I think this version is simple, yet elegant, and majestic – distinctive, easily recognisable, and easy to like. I’ll get a few made for myself.

(Lots of information can be found on the existing official and unofficial flags here: https://britishcountyflags.com/2013/07/31/wiltshire-flag/ .)

Symbolomania – The obsession with symbolism over reality

By all means, accuse me of inventing too many words with the suffix ‘-mania’, but I do find it to be infinitely useful.

The year is 2019. The month is May. Fans of fantasy all around the world gather to watch the final episode of Game of Thrones.

Daenerys Targaryen has, inexplicably, gone mad. Jon Snow decides to kill her. Drogon, her dragon, after seeing this, decides to attack … the Iron Throne.

It makes no sense. Dragons in this world, while unable to speak or communicate telepathically as they can in some other fantasy worlds, are supposedly ferociously intelligent. There is no way that Drogon doesn’t know that it was Jon Snow who killed Daenerys. Dragons are also vicious, and rather indifferent to humans other than the ones they are bound to in some way. Drogon would kill Jon Snow. That would make sense.

But instead the dragon attacks … the chair. Why? It’s a chair. What does it mean to a dragon? Unless of course, Drogon somehow knows what the chair symbolises – the desire for power, and all the infighting it causes. Drogon, in this moment, gains a meta-level understanding of the world he’s in. He momentarily becomes the audience, and that’s why he attacks the symbol and impetus of the show.

For a show that is supposed to be realist, this is ridiculous. It only happens because the writers think it’s profound, and that profundity takes precedence over physical and logical realism. It is one of the many reasons why the show is considered a car crash, and why people hardly ever talk about it now, despite it being one of the most popular shows in the world for about a decade.

In the subsequent years, I have seen this obsession with symbols many other times. I have seen people be obsessed with the symbolism of something – what they think it means – regardless of the actual logical, physical, or logistical consequences of something, regardless of reality.

I won’t enumerate all of the examples, as that would make this post unbearably long, but I will focus on one: royalty.

I am a royalist. It’s actually one of the few ‘-ist’ words I will actually apply to myself. I’ll save a full explanation of why I’m a royalist for another post, but it’s worth saying that being a royalist does not mean that you support or are in favour of every single thing every single member of the royal family does all the time. It means you are in favour of the concept of royalty.

In any discussion on royalty, one of the arguments against it you’ll hear quite often and quite early on is ‘I don’t think anyone should be considered “better” than anyone else.’ – in other words, they see the meaning of ‘royalty’ as being that some people in society should be higher up, higher in status, more important, intrinsically more moral people – better.

It’s a weird argument, because I don’t think anyone who is a royalist today actually believes that members of the royal family are better, more worthy, than the rest of us. I think royalists just see the royal family as inheritors of an ancient tradition who have a life-long duty to preserve a substantial proportion of our cultural heritage. That does not make them better, or more worthy. They are not necessarily more moral people, nor should they escape justice when justice is needed. Now sure, we should expect higher standards of them than we do of most people, since they are the inheritors of this legacy, and the performers of its rituals, but this does not mean they are necessarily better.

I think the people who see royalty as some kind of status of intrinsic superiority are obsessed with what they believe the symbolism of royalty is rather than the practical, real effects that we see in society as a result of them (or even, indeed, a truer, actual symbolism, rather than a false interpretation). In that sense they are the same as the writers of Game of Thrones (and the very small number of people who actually liked that final episode).

So I find I need a word to describe this phenomenon. I choose symbolomania – the obsession with symbols or symbolism – usually a perceived symbolism – over reality or over a more logical understanding of something.